Backend

Back-end development vs monolith-first: which is better for early-stage products?

The question is about Backend .

Answer:

Monolith-first is usually better for early-stage products. It lets teams build and ship features quickly, as everything is in one codebase, making setup, updates, and debugging more straightforward. Standalone back-end services often add early complexity, slowing teams down unless scale or domain-specific issues require a more distributed approach.

Find your perfect BE tech match

Sargis is a skilled Java Software Engineer focusing on backend development with over 7 years of experience. His expertise encompasses Java, Spring Framework, and Spring Boot, which he has utilized to create robust application... Read More

Level
Senior
Availability
40 h/w
Experience
7.5 yrs.
English
B2

Serhiy specializes in backend development with a strong focus on PHP and frameworks like Laravel and Magento. With 9 years of experience, he has developed a proficient understanding of object-oriented programming, enabling hi... Read More

Level
Senior
Availability
40 h/w
Experience
9 yrs.
English
B2

Mikayel specializes in backend development with a strong focus on Node.js and Nest.js, bringing 8 years of experience in crafting scalable applications. His expertise includes working with various frameworks such as Angular a... Read More

Level
Senior
Availability
40 h/w
Experience
8 yrs.
English
B2
Victoriia S.

Victoriia is a skilled Flutter Developer with 4 years of experience in mobile application development. She specializes in frameworks such as Flutter, leveraging JavaScript, DART, and utilizes databases like MySQL and Firebase... Read More

Level
Senior
Availability
20 - 30 h/w
Experience
10 yrs.
English
C1
Cortance 5-star rating on ClutchCortance 5-star rating on GoodFirms
Anonymous
Strategic Digital Marketer

Cortance helped the end client's site see significant improvements in Core Web Vitals scores and page speed tests. The team was quick to respond to questions and requests and always checked in to ensure the work was progressing well. Their communication and pricing were transparent.

Clutch
5.0/5.0
Anush Sedrakyan
Partnership Manager

Cortance's efforts increased device compatibility, improved system interoperability, and reduced time-to-market by 20%. The team adapted to the client's workflow and provided resources aligned with the project's needs. Cortance's commitment to understanding the requirements was impressive.

Clutch
5.0/5.0
Curved left line
We're Here to Help

Thinking about how to expand a tech team flexibly to adapt to different working paces?

Accelerate development, meet launch deadlines with flexible, much-needed capacity. Add new skills your team currently lacks.

Curved right line