C#

Is C# better than Ruby for back-end development?

The question is about C# .

Answer:

C# is a better choice than Ruby for back-end development when you need high performance, scalability, or Microsoft tooling. C# works well for enterprise systems because the .NET framework is powerful, strongly typed, and supports async programming. Ruby, especially with Ruby on Rails, is better for small projects or for creating an application quickly. It is often used for startups and simple websites. For very large applications, C# works better. But Ruby is ideal when you want fast results and easy code.

Find your perfect C# tech match

Justin focuses on building data-heavy web platforms with .NET and Vue.js. As a Senior Software Engineer with ~12 years of commercial experience, he works end to end across backend services, UI delivery, and operational readin... Read More

Level
Senior
Availability
40 h/w
Experience
12 yrs.
English
C2

Hadi focuses on building data-driven web systems that connect solid backend delivery with applied analytics. He is a Senior Full Stack Software Engineer with ~5 years of commercial experience, based in Germany, with fluent En... Read More

Level
Senior
Availability
40 h/w
Experience
5 yrs.
English
C2

Kamal is a Senior Software Engineer with a strong focus on full-stack development, leveraging extensive experience in C#, .NET, and SQL to create robust applications. He has been instrumental in building RESTful APIs and opti... Read More

Level
Senior
Availability
20 - 30 h/w
Experience
6 yrs.
English
B2
Victoriia S.

Victoriia is a skilled Flutter Developer with 4 years of experience in mobile application development. She specializes in frameworks such as Flutter, leveraging JavaScript, DART, and utilizes databases like MySQL and Firebase... Read More

Level
Senior
Availability
20 - 30 h/w
Experience
10 yrs.
English
C1
Cortance 5-star rating on ClutchCortance 5-star rating on GoodFirms
Valerii Torianyk
CEO

Cortance delivered the project within schedule and according to the end client's requirements. The team had a clear workflow and was responsible, professional, and kind. They translated the end client's vision into the product and faced any challenges with patience and impressive responsiveness.

Clutch
5.0/5.0
Andrew Biter
COO

Cortance was able to supplement the client's organization with highly-qualified professionals. The team was consistently efficient from a project management standpoint, and internal stakeholders were particularly impressed with the vendor's supportiveness, responsiveness, and agility of delivery.

Clutch
5.0/5.0
Curved left line
We're Here to Help

Thinking about how to expand a tech team flexibly to adapt to different working paces?

Accelerate development, meet launch deadlines with flexible, much-needed capacity. Add new skills your team currently lacks.

Curved right line