What problems can come from using Viper architecture?
Using Viper can add complexity, a steeper learning curve, and more initial setup. With five component types (View, Interactor, Presenter, Entity, Router), a Viper project involves many extra files and code. This setup takes more time and can be confusing, especially for small apps where a simpler architecture would suffice. Teams must follow Viper rules very closely, which can feel restrictive and slow. There is often a lot of repeated (boilerplate) code, making the code harder to read and update. Because of these drawbacks, Viper usually isn’t the best choice for small projects or for teams who want a simple process.
Related VIPER Questions And Answers
- What is the difference between Viper and MVC in iOS development?
- What is Viper used for?
- Is Viper architecture suitable for all types of iOS applications?
- What benefits do you get by using Viper architecture?
- Will AI replace Viper developers?
- VIPER vs MVVM: which architecture is better for iOS apps?
- VIPER vs MVC: which is easier to maintain in large codebases?
- VIPER vs Clean Architecture: which scales better for complex features?
- What is the difference between Viper and Clean Architecture?
- What are the key components of the Viper architecture?
- Viper vs MVVM for iOS projects?
- Is Viper commonly used in large-scale or small-scale projects?
Hire trusted VIPER devs from Ukraine & Europe in 48h
Skip the hiring headaches and get trusted VIPER developers who deliver results. Cortance has helped startups scale to million-dollar success stories.
Looking for consultation? Can't find the perfect match? Let's connect!
Drop me a line with your requirements, or let's lock in a call to find the right expert for your project.
Questions About Specialized Skills










