Three.js

Three.js vs raw WebGL: which gives more control and performance?

The question is about Three.js .

Answer:

Raw WebGL offers the most control and potentially better performance because you interact directly with the graphics layer without extra abstraction. Three.js simplifies 3D development but adds overhead and restricts access to certain low-level WebGL features. Use raw WebGL for maximum optimisation, but Three.js for faster development and usability.

Related Three.js Questions And Answers

Ready to Hire?

Hire trusted Three.js devs from Ukraine & Europe in 48h

Skip the hiring headaches and get trusted Three.js developers who deliver results. Cortance has helped startups scale to million-dollar success stories.

Cortance developer 1Cortance developer 2Cortance developer 3

Find your perfect Three.js tech match

No available Three.js at the moment

All our Three.js are currently busy. Leave a request for info — we'll notify you once a suitable one becomes available.

Cortance 5-star rating on ClutchCortance 5-star rating on GoodFirms
Julian Spivakov
COO

Thanks to Cortance, the client successfully launched their project on time and within budget. Cortance provided the client with professional and responsible talents. They also ensured excellent project management using Jira and promoted effective communication via daily calls and biweekly calls.

Clutch
5.0/5.0
Anonymous
Co-Owner

Cortance's work resulted in a 30% reduction in development time, exceeding expectations. Their high-quality resource leasing was instrumental in surpassing the project goals, which set new benchmarks for the client. Cortance's ability to provide highly skilled tech professionals was exceptional.

Clutch
5.0/5.0
Curved left line
We're Here to Help

Looking for consultation? Can't find the perfect match? Let's connect!

Drop me a line with your requirements, or let's lock in a call to find the right expert for your project.

Curved right line