Which is better depends on the project's needs. Three.js is lighter and runs directly in the browser for web 3D graphics and animations, making it ideal for simple web projects. Unity provides a complete engine for full-scale games with features like physics, AI, and VR. Three.js is more suitable for web-based visuals, while Unity excels at complex or cross-platform games.
Related Three.js Questions And Answers
- Is Three.js good for game development?
- What is the difference between JavaScript and Three.js?
- How does Three.js handle lighting and shadows in 3D scenes?
- How does Three.js work with WebGL to render 3D graphics?
- Is it possible to use Three.js together with React?
- What are the best practices for managing complex 3D scenes in Three.js?
- What is the difference between Unreal Engine and Three.js?
- What are the performance considerations when using Three.js in web applications?
- What are the common issues when integrating Three.js with React?
- What is the difference between D3.js and Three.js?
- Can Three.js be used for augmented reality (AR) experiences?
- Is Three.js the same as WebGL?
- What is Three.js used for?
- How does Three.js work with React?
- Three.js vs Babylon.js: which is better for WebGL apps?
- Three.js vs raw WebGL: which gives more control and performance?
- Three.js vs Canvas 2D: which is better for interactive visuals?
- Phaser.js vs Three.js
- What is the Ideal Three.js stack for interactive 3D web experiences?
- What technologies does Three.js work best with for web-based 3D?
- Unity vs Three.js: which to pick for a 3D product demo?
- Three.js + React: what does it work best for?
- What stack is ideal for Three.js for 3D web?
- What combination is not good to use together with Three.js?
- What combination is not good with Three.js at the beginning?
Hire trusted Three.js devs from Ukraine & Europe in 48h
Skip the hiring headaches and get trusted Three.js developers who deliver results. Cortance has helped startups scale to million-dollar success stories.
Find your perfect Three.js tech match
No available Three.js at the moment
All our Three.js are currently busy.
Leave a request for info — we'll notify you once a suitable one becomes available.
Cortance delivered a functional, stable system on time, receiving positive feedback from the end client. The team was responsive to feedback and quickly resolved issues, communicating via virtual meetings, emails, and messaging apps. Their proactive approach impressed the client.
Cortance helped the end client's site see significant improvements in Core Web Vitals scores and page speed tests. The team was quick to respond to questions and requests and always checked in to ensure the work was progressing well. Their communication and pricing were transparent.
Looking for consultation? Can't find the perfect match? Let's connect!
Drop me a line with your requirements, or let's lock in a call to find the right expert for your project.
Questions About Specialized Skills
